Last Updated on April 22, 2022
It is important at all stages of a Federal Disability Retirement application for CSRS and FERSemployees to predict, anticipate, and preempt the arguments which the Office of Personnel Management may make, will make, and can be expected to make.
Obviously, the three main areas of such concern are: Sufficiency of medical documentation; Agency efforts for accommodation and reassignment; the impact and interconnection between one’s medical condition(s) and the positional duties of one’s job.
However, there are multiple other areas, and it is the job of an applicant filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits, or his/her disability attorney, to anticipate the areas of OPM’s concerns, and to address them both factually and legally — the latter, by pointing out statutory authorities and case-law holdings directly or implicitly touching upon those very areas of concern.
Further, one should never be fooled if, in an initial denial of an OPM Disability Retirement application, the substance of a denial is fairly short or if it is detailed and lengthy; the content of a denial letter should not determine the extent of a response by an applicant at the Reconsideration Stage.
Instead, whether short, of “middle length”, or extremely detailed, a proper disability denial response should anticipate all areas of concern, and the employee applicant who is attempting to secure an approval for his or her Federal Disability Retirement benefits should always preempt any potential areas for a further denial.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire