Last Updated on February 15, 2011
The Second Denial — a denial from the Office of Personnel Management of a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS or CSRS — often fails to annotate or delineate an extensive basis for the denial, but simply reiterates that they believe the original decision was correct based upon a re-review of the application.
It means nothing more than that another Claims Representative in a separate “branch” of the same Agency decided to support the original Claims Representative in denying the application. No greater validity is obtained merely because two different people looked at the application, as well as any additional medical or other supporting documentation, and came to the same conclusion. Two people can be wrong about the same issue, and indeed, OPM is normally wrong about issues concerning Federal Disability Retirement applications, precisely because many OPM Representatives (if not most) do not keep up with the Court opinions and evolving case laws rendered by the Merit Systems Protection Board and the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals cases. Moreover, most Claims Representatives at OPM support their fellow Claims Representative.
A disabled Federal employee or an injured Postal worker should not become discouraged merely because a Second Denial has been issued. Being wrong twice does not translate into a right decision. This is not mathematics, where two negatives result in a positive conclusion. It is merely the next “step” in the process of obtaining a Federal Disability Retirement approval under either FERS or CSRS.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire