Last Updated on April 26, 2022
Life presents conundrums; puzzles exist to be solved, but few attempt to understand the foundational precepts which need to be discovered and applied; ergo, Aristotle remains an esoteric author of antiquity, to be rediscovered and in whom delight approaches an enduring mystery.
In every endeavor of that vast designation identified as “life”, difficulties abound, challenges confront, and obstacles confound. One hears about the “easy” life, how X has it so “comfortable”, and the proverbial, “if only I…”
In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, one often hears about the “easy” case — it proves itself; the evidence is so overwhelming that…
Take the following hypothetical: X has an OWCP case approved; Second opinion and referee doctors all state that X cannot return to performing one or more of the essential elements of one’s job; additionally, SSDI has been granted; and on top of everything else, the agency has removed X from the Federal or Postal rolls, based upon one’s “Medical Inability to perform the essential elements of his/her job.”
As Federal Disability Retirement cases go, this may constitute and possess elements which most would consider a “sure thing”. Easy case? What is missing? As to the first question, the answer is a resounding, “No”. As to the second question, those who have inquired as to the “first principles” in Aristotelian fashion, will be able to discover the answer, and this author need not state thejavascript: obvious.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire