Federal Worker Disability Retirement: How the Historical Background Is Stated Can Make All the Difference

Last Updated on June 9, 2022

In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, one must address the issue of the Applicant’s Statement of Disability (Standard Form 3112A), and answer questions regarding the medical conditions, their impact upon one’s ability or inability to perform the essential elements of one’s positional duties as slotted; impact upon other areas of one’s life, etc.

The problem with many respondents to such a form (by “respondent” is meant to identify the Federal or Postal employee who is completing the form and filling out the SF 3112A for filing of a Federal Disability Retirement Application) is the manner in which it is responded to — the “how” it is stated.  In journalism, there is the standard approach of providing information:  Who, what, when, where and how.

Such satisfaction of a journalistic approach provides the reader with the necessary information required to complete a story.  In that type of forum, however, the penalty for providing the wrong “how” is merely bad penmanship, and some potential criticism by the general reading public.

In applying for Federal Disability Retirement benefits, however, the penalty for a wrong “how” may be a disqualification from being able to receive OPM Disability Retirement benefits, because the historical context of the condition can impact the legal criteria for eligibility.

Be careful in formulating the Applicant’s Statement of Disability; what one says matters; how one says it may matter most.

Sincerely,

Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Postal & Federal Disability Lawyer

 

4 thoughts on “Federal Worker Disability Retirement: How the Historical Background Is Stated Can Make All the Difference”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *