primary documentation in a fers disability claim should ideally come from the treating physician

Federal and Postal Disability Retirement: Persuasive Impact

Posted onAuthorFederal Disability Retirement AttorneyLeave a comment

In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, it is important not to confuse the difference between that which is central in proving one’s Federal Disability Retirement application, from that which is merely of persuasive import. In some cases, there may be a necessity, for very pragmatic reasons, to deliberately switch the two; but as a general rule, the argument for persuasive documentation should be used as secondary sources of proof. […] Read More …

Physicians and the Substance of a Federal Disability Retirement Case

Posted onAuthorFederal Disability Retirement Attorney1 Comment

Ultimately, the essence of any claim, endeavor, vocation or activity possesses a characteristic “essence” of a matter — that which defines itself, reveals its core value, and manifests the substantive content of what X “is” as opposed to the accidental and peripheral appearances which can throw one off from the central enigma of that which we seek to unravel. […] Read More …

CSRS & FERS Medical Disability Retirement: The Treating Doctor

Posted onAuthorFederal Disability Retirement AttorneyLeave a comment

There is efficacy and motivational bias. Sometimes, unintended consequences result in the coalescence of both, but where the result is unaffected by the underlying reason for acting upon an event. In OWCP cases, the motivational bias almost always includes […] Read More …