the federal disability retirement attorney’s weapon: effective arguments from past case laws

Medical Retirement from Federal Government Employment: Precedents and Contingencies

Posted onOctober 8, 2015AuthorFederal Disability Retirement Attorney2 Comments

The former constitutes a prior event already established, which may influence and impact current courses and future decisions; while the latter reflects an unforeseen circumstance as yet uncertain, but one which must occur prior to triggering the subsequent act. Both constitute events which, in their logical sequence, should be prior in time, and satisfied before going on to the next. In law, without the precedent, there is no argument to be made, except […] Read More …

FERS & CSRS Disability Retirement for Federal and USPS Workers: ICM versus ICBM

Posted onJune 12, 2014AuthorFederal Disability Retirement AttorneyLeave a comment

During the Cold War era, the latter acronym was familiar to most, as fears were magnified as to the intercontinental capacity of the U.S.S.R. (those who can still decipher this immediately reveals one’s age). In those days, one did not need to know the Eastern […] Read More …

Postal and Federal Disability Retirement: The Efficacy of an Argument

Posted onMay 27, 2013March 9, 2021AuthorFederal Disability Retirement AttorneyLeave a comment

If a security system is never triggered, can one conclude that it has been effective? Is the failure of a system more telling than its lack of use? Can the negation of a fact be used to prove its existence and the validity of a theoretical construct? Can one argue, […] Read More …